BANDA ACEH | INDATANEWS.COM - The controversy surrounding the issuance of a case termination order (SP3) by the Aceh Barat Police has intensified once again. The latest escalation was triggered by demonstrations outside the police headquarters and growing narratives circulating in digital spaces, which the legal counsel considers a deliberate attempt at reputational damage. In response, Berliana Siregar, S.H., representing the legal team of Muhammad Amin, Muhardi, and Muklis, issued a legal statement she described as final, unequivocal, and non-negotiable.
The legal representative emphasized that following the issuance of the SP3, the situation has increasingly shifted beyond legal boundaries and is instead being influenced by public pressure outside proper judicial procedures."This SP3 is clear evidence that our clients are innocent and that all allegations made by the complainant are fabricated," Berliana stated on Friday, July 3, 2026.
The legal team further urged the complainant to pursue formal legal remedies if they disagree with the SP3 decision. The only available legal avenue, she noted, is a pretrial hearing (Praperadilan) under Article 77 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) at the district court.
Berliana also underscored that demonstrations aimed at influencing public opinion do not align with the principles of a lawful criminal justice process. According to her, disputes must be resolved strictly through established judicial mechanisms rather than through public pressure.
The legal team further pointed to alleged formal deficiencies in the power of attorney used by the complainant's side. The document reportedly combines different legal entities, including a commercial law firm and a legal aid organization.
"This situation creates ambiguity regarding the legal standing of the authorized representative and may constitute a violation of administrative law principles," Berliana said."Citizens should be cautious of unauthorized legal assistants who act without official professional responsibility," Berliana warned.
In addition, the legal representatives highlighted activities in digital spaces, particularly the dissemination of videos and narratives related to the protests. These actions, they said, could potentially lead to legal consequences under cyber law provisions.
Reference was made to Article 27A of Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, as well as Articles 310 and 311 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) concerning defamation and slander.Failure to comply, they stated, could result in criminal proceedings through the cyber division of the police, as well as civil lawsuits for unlawful acts under Article 1365 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), with compensation claims reaching billions.
"Law must not be intimidated by mass pressure. We are ready to take this case through official legal channels," Berliana concluded. (IDNC)REPORTER: Adli Safwan | EDITOR: Fik Sagala